Affiliates
| Works by
William Rothman (Writer) |
Email: ???
(Please fix this email address before you use it.
We're trying
to reduce spam! ) Website:
???
Profile created May 26, 2009 |
-
Three Documentary Filmmakers: Errol
Morris, Ross Mcelwee, Jean Rouch (2009)
Film study has tended to treat documentary as a marginal
form, but as the essaysin Three Documentary Filmmakers
demonstrate, the films of Jean Rouch, Ross McElwee, and Errol Morris
call for, and reward, the sort of criticism expected of serious works in
any medium. However, critical methods that illuminate what makes Citizen
Kane a great film are not adequate for expressing what it is about
Rouch's The Funeral at Bongo: The Old Annaļ, McElwee's Time
Indefinite, and Morris's The Fog of War that makes them--each
in its own way--great films as well. Although these filmmakers differ
strikingly from one another, their films are deeply philosophical and
personal, and explore the paradoxical relationships between fantasy and
reality, self and world, fiction and documentary, dreams and film,
filming and living. It is a challenge to find terms of criticism capable
of illuminating such works, and the essays in this book rise to that
challenge.
-
The 'I' of the Camera: Essays in Film
Criticism, History and Aesthetics
(1988, 2003)
Originally published in 1988, The "I" of the
Camera has become a classic in the literature of film. Offering
alternatives to the viewing and criticism of film, William Rothman
challenges readers to think about film in adventurous ways that are more
open to movies and our experience of them. In a series of eloquent
essays examining the "Americanness" of American film, Rothman argues
compellingly that movies have inherited the philosophical perspective of
American transcendentalism. This second edition includes fourteen new
essays, written after the book's first publication, as well as a new
foreword.s
-
Reading Cavell's the World Viewed: A
Philosophical Perspective on Film
(2000) with With Marian Keane
In their study of one of Stanley Cavell's greatest
yet most neglected books, William Rothman and Marian Keane address this
eminent philosopher's many readers, from a variety of disciplines, who
have neither understood why he has given film so much attention, nor
grasped the place of "The World Viewed" within the totality of his
writings about film. The authors also reintroduce "The World Viewed" to
the field of film studies. When the new field entered universities in
the late 1960s, it predicated its legitimacy on the conviction that the
medium's artistic achievements called for serious criticism and on the
corollary conviction that no existing field was capable of the criticism
film called for. The study of film needed to found itself,
intellectually, upon a philosophical investigation of the conditions of
the medium and art of film. Such was the challenge "The World Viewed"
took upon itself. However, film studies opted to embrace theory as a
higher authority than our experiences of movies, divorcing itself from
the philosophical perspective of self-reflection apart from which, "The
World Viewed" teaches, we cannot know what movies mean, or what they
are. Rothman and Keane now argue that the poststructuralist theories
that dominated film studies for a quarter of a century no longer compel
conviction, Cavell's brilliant and beautiful book can provide a sense of
liberation to a field that has foresaken its original calling. Read in a
way that acknowledges its philosophical achievement, "The World Viewed"
can show the field a way to move forward by rediscovering its passion
for the art of film. The title should be useful to scholars and students
of film and philosophy, and to those in other fields, such as literary
studies and American studies, who have found Cavell's work provocative
and fruitful.
-
Documentary Film Classics
(1997)
Documentary Film Classics offers close readings on
a number of major films, such as Nanook of the North,,Land Without
Bread, Night and Fog, Chronicle of a Summer and Don't Look Back.
Spanning the history of the documentary film tradition, William Rothman
analyzes the philosophical and historical issues and themes implicit in
these works. Designed to guide film students through the "texts" of a
wide range of documentaries, his readings also focus on the achievements
of these works as films per se.
-
Hitchcock: The Murderous Gaze
(1982)
No reader of this challenging book will ever view
a Hitchcock film (perhaps any film) in quite the same way again. By a
close analysis of five representative works and documenting his readings
with more than 600 frame enlargements, Rothman shows how Hitchcock
composed his films--how each moment bears his imprint and his special
demands on the viewer. It is the seriousness of Hitchcock's reflections
on the murderous power of the camera's gaze, and on the larger mysteries
of love and murder, that makes him a monumental figure in the history of
film. Rothman follows the course of these reflections from the gripping
images of the silent film The Lodger (1926) to what he terms
Hitchcock's final call for acknowledgment in Psycho (1960). The
continuity is traced through Murder! (1930), the most ambitious
of the early films; The Thirty-Nine Steps (1935), which
established a new genre (the "Hitchcock thriller") and gave the world
its sense of Hitchcock as the "master of suspense"; and Shadow of a
Doubt (1943), the director's cunning demonstration to an American
audience of what a Hitchcock film really is. Rothman's readings
immeasurably deepen our appreciation of Hitchcock's individual
achievement. At the same time the book is a sustained meditation,
philosophically scrupulous, on the medium and the art of film, on the
conditions of authorship in film, and on the ways that serious films
might be approached in acts of viewing and criticism.
| |
| Related Topics Click any of the following links for more information on similar topics of interest in relation to this page.
William Rothman Is Listed As A Favorite Of (Alphabetical Order By First Name)
Brad Rader
William's Favorite Authors/Books (Alphabetical Order By First Name)
[As of x] TO BE DETERMINED |